Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: optimize XCHG to MOV for same-register forms

Jan Beulich via Valgrind-developers <valgrind-developers-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.debugging.valgrind.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.binutils
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 03.07.2026 08:09, Paul Floyd wrote:
> On 2026-07-03 08:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 03.07.2026 06:55, Paul Floyd wrote:
>>> Would it be possible for gas to only do this transformation if the source and destination registers are different?
>> When the registers are different, this transformation is invalid to do.
> 
> OK so you are optimising a no-op. Does GCC use it as a no-op?

I don't expect so. In fact, my take is that -O... should not be used on
compiler generated code. The compiler should do whatever optimizations
are possible / sensible, and it should not emit code which can (easily)
further be optimized. (Easily because the assembler really only does
very simple and pretty obvious transformations.)

I can see that there may be a desire to optimize asm()-generated code.
That imo shouldn't be done by passing -Wa,-O... but rather by some
other, to be invented machinery. (We could tie it to the #APP / #NO_APP
markers that the compiler emits, for example.)

Jan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.