Re: RFC: Fix for CVE-2026-19548
Hans-Peter Nilsson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 17 Aug 2026, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Alan, > > > The bug report says: > > "The vulnerability is triggered when LTO plugins are active > > (link_info.lto_plugin_active is true) and the input object has > > abfd->my_archive == NULL" > > > > If my_archive is NULL the bfd isn't an archive member! > > True - I suspect that this is a theoretical bug, rather than an exploitable > one. > > > How is it that add_archive_element is being called for something that > > isn't a member of an archive? Do you have a testcase? > > No - I was just responding to the CVE - which does not provide a testcase. > Cheers > Nick Does that mean that the binutils CVE process has an exploitable flaw in which an opponent can DOS developers with red herring CVEs? 1/2 :-) brgds, H-P