CTF state in binutils vs gcc

Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.binutils
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Nick,

when building released gcc versions, I prefer to build combined binutils+gcc
trees. Doing so with 2.47 / 16.2.0, however, points out that include/ctf.h
have diverged to a degree that it is not immediately obvious which header to
take into the combined tree: 2.47's is newer than 16.2.0's, yet gcc won't
build with binutils' header.

Aren't the two files anyway supposed to remain in sync?

Thanks, Jan
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.