Re: [PATCH] x86: support -Ofast
Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.binutils |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 28.08.2026 11:05, Jiang, Haochen wrote: >> From: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> >> Sent: Friday, August 28, 2026 4:40 PM >> --- >> If we wanted to also use this to control optimization of NOP-like insns >> (e.g. the XCHG -> MOV one), the variable would want renaming. Question is: >> _Do_ we (perhaps) want that? > > NOP insns might be another topic. It is still vague to me. I will lean on if we > have -Ofast, we could include that. And which variable would want renaming? > I did not get that. Imo while -Ofast naming-wise fits the purpose there as well, "fast_math" makes little sense when also covering non-math transformations. Jan