Re: Softphones and arm builds with latest ccrtp, and exosip2 arm builds are broken

I am always glad when we do not break other packages :).  Hmm...Twinkle
has it's own sip stack?

Michel de Boer wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> Thanks for this confirmation. It was still on my todo list to
> build Twinkle against the latest libarries.
> 
> Cheers,
> Michel
> 
> David Sugar wrote:
>> I have now also successfully built Twinkle without issues against
>> current CommonC++/ccrtp...
>>
>> David Sugar wrote:
>>> I have been able to successfully build sflphoned/sflphone-qt against the
>>> latest commoncpp2 (1.4.1) and ccrtp (1.4.0), and I will try to do the
>>> same with twinkle next.  I also have been able to successfully build
>>> ccrtp without difficulty on arm for ipaq for gpe/opie/qtopia.
>>>
>>> While I had no problem with libosip2, I have not been able to
>>> successfully cross-compile libeXosip2 for arm as yet, and I get many
>>> very odd bugs and errors in places that do not even make immediate sense
>>> to me.  This means probably neither sflphone nor twinkle will port
>>> successfully at this time, since they both also make use of exosip2 code.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccrtp-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ccrtp-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel
>

_______________________________________________
Ccrtp-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ccrtp-devel

begin:vcard
fn:David Sugar
n:Sugar;David
org:GNU Telephony
email;internet:[email protected]
tel;work:+1 201 215 2609
url:http://www.gnutelephony.org
version:2.1
end:vcard