Re: Command Dependecies broken

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Steven Allen wrote:
>
> I noticed this bug/feature a year or more ago, and I thought it had been
> fixed, but apparently not. This broke sometime after cons 2.2, because this
> behaves correctly on cons 2.2 (or at least I think the 2.2 behavior is
> correct).
>
[...]
>
> If I then manually "echo asdfadsf > foo.2" and run cons again, I get:
>
> 	cons: "." is up-to-date.
>

Wow !!!!

One begins to wonder what the Cons test-suite actually does ....
(145 testcases when I last updated via CVS)

I use a version of cons somewhere between 2.2 and 2.3
(RCS-version 1.145), and it seems to work in the old-fashioned more
correct way.

/Johan Holmberg



_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/