Re: Debian package and development of CONS

Tom Surace <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:46:06 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:53:51PM -0400, Dmitry Sagalovskiy wrote:
[...]
> As a side note, for those who maintain the websites for cons and SCons,
> I wonder if there is something you can do (like add keywords or whatnot)
> so that it's possible to find cons and Scons by searching Google for
> "alternative to make" or "build system". Both systems are really superior
> to make (in my experience), but for some reason are pretty hard to find if
> you don't know what they are called.

Even if you do know what you're looking for and search for cons, instead
you do find a lot of "pros and cons". Not very helpful. 

Cons's functionality is superior to make, but cons itself is difficult to
debug and enhance. :} Is there some reason this group isn't directing new 
users enthusiastically towards scons? 

tom
-- 
This is not spam!

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE/S2SeLSTXXKCRO+gRAkxjAKCKTuDhMvEYVgn9jtV6Jaso8NfEPgCgtpc6
gtrjZl+0kIAFVjsYoMZ06DU=
=jwHR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----