Re: Debian package and development of CONS
Tom Surace <[email protected]> Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:46:06 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:53:51PM -0400, Dmitry Sagalovskiy wrote: [...] > As a side note, for those who maintain the websites for cons and SCons, > I wonder if there is something you can do (like add keywords or whatnot) > so that it's possible to find cons and Scons by searching Google for > "alternative to make" or "build system". Both systems are really superior > to make (in my experience), but for some reason are pretty hard to find if > you don't know what they are called. Even if you do know what you're looking for and search for cons, instead you do find a lot of "pros and cons". Not very helpful. Cons's functionality is superior to make, but cons itself is difficult to debug and enhance. :} Is there some reason this group isn't directing new users enthusiastically towards scons? tom -- This is not spam! _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 232 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE/S2SeLSTXXKCRO+gRAkxjAKCKTuDhMvEYVgn9jtV6Jaso8NfEPgCgtpc6 gtrjZl+0kIAFVjsYoMZ06DU= =jwHR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----