Re: Split cons code (was: Re: Debian package and development of CONS)

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--===============1102418511==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="=_alternative 004BDD7188256D98_="

This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 004BDD7188256D98_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

On Sept. 6, 2002, I submitted a message to this group that included source 
that has since fixed my dependency problems with the Command method.  We 
have been using Cons 2.3.0 and we are very happy with the performance and 
reliability. 
---
Rick Croote











Johan Holmberg <[email protected]>
Sent by: 
[email protected]
09/05/2003 12:00 AM

 
        To:     Pierre THIERRY <[email protected]>
        cc:     [email protected]
(bcc: Rick Croote/ATL-BTL/MS/PHILIPS)
        Subject:        Re: Split cons code (was: Re: Debian package and development of CONS)
        Classification: 





Pierre THIERRY <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> In fact, in the Debian package I'm creating with 2.3.0, [...]
>

Is it really a good idea to distribute 2.3.0 ?
The dependency code in that version is broken.

This was discussed at length between 26/6 and 30/7 last year (2002).
Read the threads with subjects:

    "Command Dependecies broken"     (yes a typo here)
    "command dependencies broken"

for example my mail from 30/7:

    http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/cons-discuss/2002-07/msg00007.html


/Johan Holmberg



_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/



--=_alternative 004BDD7188256D98_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"


<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">On Sept. 6, 2002, I submitted a message to this group that included source that has since fixed my dependency problems with the Command method. &nbsp;We have been using Cons 2.3.0 and we are very happy with the performance and reliability. &nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">---</font>
<br><font size=2 face="sans-serif">Rick Croote</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=100%>
<tr valign=top>
<td>
<td>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif"><b>Johan Holmberg &lt;[email protected]&gt;</b></font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">Sent by: </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">[email protected]</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">09/05/2003 12:00 AM</font>
<br>
<td><font size=1 face="Arial">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; </font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; To: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Pierre THIERRY &lt;[email protected]&gt;</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; cc: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;[email protected]<br>
(bcc: Rick Croote/ATL-BTL/MS/PHILIPS)</font>
<br><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Subject: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Re: Split cons code (was: Re: Debian package and development of CONS)</font>
<p><font size=1 face="sans-serif">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; Classification: &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;</font>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=2 face="Courier New"><br>
<br>
Pierre THIERRY &lt;[email protected]&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; In fact, in the Debian package I'm creating with 2.3.0, [...]<br>
&gt;<br>
<br>
Is it really a good idea to distribute 2.3.0 ?<br>
The dependency code in that version is broken.<br>
<br>
This was discussed at length between 26/6 and 30/7 last year (2002).<br>
Read the threads with subjects:<br>
<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;&quot;Command Dependecies broken&quot; &nbsp; &nbsp; (yes a typo here)<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;&quot;command dependencies broken&quot;<br>
<br>
for example my mail from 30/7:<br>
<br>
 &nbsp; &nbsp;http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/cons-discuss/2002-07/msg00007.html<br>
<br>
<br>
/Johan Holmberg<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
[email protected]<br>
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss<br>
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/<br>
</font>
<br>
<br>
--=_alternative 004BDD7188256D98_=--



--===============1102418511==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/
--===============1102418511==--