Re: #include's and Quoting

Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:59:38 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>

David Sanderson wrote:
> | On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:59:59PM -0500, Steve Jones wrote:
> | [snip]
> | > I'm referring to the requirement that I change all my:
> | > 
> | >   #include "blah.h"
> | > 
> | > lines to be
> | > 
> | >   #include <blah.h>
> | > 
> | > in order to use repository trees.
> 
> I believe the only place where this matters is if you use cons
> repositories (the -R option).  We use "" and <> freely and do not use
> repositories, and it's worked like a champ.
> 
> David Sanderson ([email protected])

Same here -- never a problem, and we use both forms constantly.  "" for 
locally found includes, and <> for system ones.  We also don't use the 
Repository feature.

(btw: You might want to look into scons; it's a rewrite and improvement on 
cons.  It's in python, which may be good or bad for you.  We are using it 
and it is very nice.)

-- Gary



_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/