Re: #include's and Quoting
Gary Oberbrunner <[email protected]> Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:59:38 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
David Sanderson wrote: > | On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 03:59:59PM -0500, Steve Jones wrote: > | [snip] > | > I'm referring to the requirement that I change all my: > | > > | > #include "blah.h" > | > > | > lines to be > | > > | > #include <blah.h> > | > > | > in order to use repository trees. > > I believe the only place where this matters is if you use cons > repositories (the -R option). We use "" and <> freely and do not use > repositories, and it's worked like a champ. > > David Sanderson ([email protected]) Same here -- never a problem, and we use both forms constantly. "" for locally found includes, and <> for system ones. We also don't use the Repository feature. (btw: You might want to look into scons; it's a rewrite and improvement on cons. It's in python, which may be good or bad for you. We are using it and it is very nice.) -- Gary _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/