Re: Library installation issue
"F. Schoenahl" <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:56:27 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:08:38 -0800 (PST) Bob Sidebotham <[email protected]> wrote: > --- "F. Schoenahl" <[email protected]> wrote: > Cons is no longer actively maintained. While it does work pretty well > as advertised, development focus is on SCons, a similar system written > in Python rather than Perl. I encourage you to check SCons out. The > user community for SCons is growing and supportive. Hi Bob, thanks a lot for this nice explanation. I understand the concept now. I am a bit disapointed that perl cons isn't more maintained, now that I start to be familiar with perl. Cons is a great idea, I would say a revolution, and I really enjoy typing "cons ." and watch the clean output it produces. Now I have solved my library problem, I'll check scons. Thanks again, fred _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/