Re: Library installation issue

"F. Schoenahl" <[email protected]> Tue, 20 Jan 2004 14:56:27 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:08:38 -0800 (PST)
Bob Sidebotham <[email protected]> wrote:

> --- "F. Schoenahl" <[email protected]> wrote:
 
> Cons is no longer actively maintained. While it does work pretty well
> as advertised, development focus is on SCons, a similar system written
> in Python rather than Perl. I encourage you to check SCons out. The
> user community for SCons is growing and supportive.

Hi Bob,
thanks a lot for this nice explanation. I understand the concept now. 

I am a bit disapointed that perl cons isn't more maintained, now that I
start to be familiar with perl.

Cons is a great idea, I would say a revolution, and I really enjoy
typing "cons ." and watch the clean output it produces.

Now I have solved my library problem, I'll check scons. 

Thanks again,
fred



_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/