Re: not rebuilding out-of-date derived^2 objects
Johan Holmberg <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:02:49 +0200 (MEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Alan Grow wrote: > > Cons 2.3.0 isn't rebuilding "derived derived objects" correctly for me. > I've attached a tarball you can use to reproduce the behavior, but here's > what's going on... > Hi ! I unpacked the tar-file and tested it. It seems that your problem only occurs in recent versions of Cons. As I have said several times before: 2.3.0 is broken (see the archive of the mailing list). I don't know if your problem is the same as the ones described earlier, but I wouldn't recommend using that version. Personally, I use an older version from around 2001/01/18. The actual version is just an "accident" (I was tracking cons via CVS at that time). In summary: - there are better versions of Cons than 2.3.0 - you can't trust the Cons web-site for what version to choose /Johan Holmberg _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/