RE: Request for comments: CONS specification

>It should not be very difficult to maintain backward compatibility, so =
I
>have the feeling we could do a mistake breaking it...

I agree. It's not particular difficult speaking from experience from the
proof of concept I did for this for qs. I imagine it'll be a module the =
user
loads if he/she wants backwards compatibility.=20

>I hope Cons will be easay to package, so someone could do a very simple
>Win32 installation.

I have a lot of experience with making professional installer files for
Win32. It's not that hard. I also have access to professional developer
tools to do this. However, they are proprietary, so it would be better =
to
base create the installer files using open source tools. But when I =
looked
for those 2 years ago, I couldn=92t find any mature ones. Perhaps that =
has
changed now.

S=F8ren





_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/