Re: CONS specs update?
Vaclav Barta <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Jun 2004 17:01:40 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday 24 June 2004 10:26 pm, H. S. Teoh wrote: > > - are there other parser generators than the lex and yacc families? I ASN.1 parser generators generate code which parses data structures, for=20 example. Analogically, an XML tool may generate binding from an XML Schem= a.=20 Popular target languages for this kind of thing are C, C++ and Java, but = I'll=20 bet there's more... > > We should provide an interface to add such processors, as the main is= sue > > is that some of them don't actually have a result file, but modify an > > existing one (so we can't treat them as normal steps in the build > > process). > Ideally, though, I'd prefer to treat them as separate steps. I don't > like the idea of a file modified in-place (i.e., processingtool.pl > reads in abc.c and writes a modified version replacing abc.c). Then prepare to build across directories - there are steps (adding a key to a .NET DLL, for example) which *must not* change the name of the= =20 file. =09Bye =09=09Vasek _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/