Re: Hmmm.... future of cons?
"H. S. Teoh" <[email protected]> Tue, 21 May 2002 10:34:28 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.cons.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20020521143428.GF10548@crystal> |
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 09:24:11AM -0500, Steven Knight wrote: [snip] > Is there any consensus on whether the Cons community out there wants the > project to revive and get back on track? Or has Cons run its course, > and should be allowed to rest in peace? I can't speak for anyone else, but for one, *I* am very interested to see Cons revived. Even if it means majorly rewriting it (I don't know enough to judge ATM; I will delve into the code soon if there's enough interest.) I'm willing to help with any necessary coding as well. [snip] > A lot of the pieces are in place for revival. 2.3.1 could be released > with a minimum of work. What is involved with releasing 2.3.1? Is the coding basically done already? [snip] > But the key missing piece is someone to actually pick up the reins. Any > takers? Any comments? [snip] Unfortunately, I don't have enough time to commit to it. I *am* willing to help with the coding with whatever time I have on my hands, though. T -- "Give us money for our scam, and you will succeed!" "No thanks, I'm not a bird. I don't suck seed." _______________________________________________ [email protected] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/