Re: Future of cons?

Steven Knight wrote:
> Nadim Khemir wrote:
>> Using SCons as the core: I think we must have a serious look at that. I mean
>> that some people should try to present what is good and not. What the
>> limitations. Is that what we want?
> I'm biased, but I'd suggest we follow this path.  The SCons build engine
> is architected for it from the ground up, it has a very slick job
> architecture for parallel builds (courtesy Anthony Roach), it supports
> easy specification of new Builder and Scanner objects, and 0.08 will
> have a framework for simple and flexible specification of Platform and
> Tool specifics in environments.
Is there a Python parser for Java? I couldn't find one for Perl
- there are parsers, but no Java grammar for them...

	Bye
		Vasek

_______________________________________________
[email protected]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/cons-discuss
Cons URL: http://www.dsmit.com/cons/