bug#77597: coreutils 9.6: regression in handling security.selinux attribute for ls(1)

On 08/04/2025 08:06, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 2025-04-07 15:52, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> So maybe we class this as a kernel bug and have the kernel
>> return non 0 for this case, or even ENOTSUP.
> 
> Yes, this sounds right to me. The kernel should not pretend that there
> are no attributes when there are attributes. If the kernel doesn't want
> to tell us attribute names, it should return -1 and set errno to a value
> saying "I don't want to tell you".

I suppose we could add another flag set with -Z,
with which we would enable the "double check" if 0 logic.
-Z is not a usual option, so trying harder in this case should be OK.

cheers,
Pádraig