bug#78245: rm -d fails to remove non-empty directory
Yannick Le Pennec <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <VI1PR02MB4829B91F5EDD68AA0A29BDAE9B8F2@VI1PR02MB4829.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> |
Dear Maintainer,
On CephFS, creating a snapshot is done suchly:
$ mkdir .snap/snapshot-name
This creates a directory which contains a view of the current directory
at the time the snapshot was created, and is therefore non-empty if the
current directory was non-empty at that time. Its contents are immutable.
Removing a snapshot is done suchly:
$ rmdir .snap/snapshot-name
This works fine even if .snap/snapshot-name is non-empty, as rmdir calls
rmdir(2) directly without trying to be smart, and the Ceph filesystem
understands what rmdir on a snapshot directory means: remove the snapshot.
One would naturally expect rm -d to behave *exactly the same* as rmdir,
but this isn't the case, because rm -d first does a getdents on the
directory, observes it is non-empty, and refuses to perform the removal.
From what I understand, this is non-compliant behavior per XCU rm 2.a. and 4.
and XSH remove():
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/rm.html
> 2. If file is of type directory, the following steps shall be taken:
> a. If neither the -R option nor the -r option is specified, but -d
> is specified, rm shall proceed with step 3 for the current file.
> 4. rm shall perform actions equivalent to the remove() function defined
> in the System Interfaces volume of POSIX.1-2024 called with a
> pathname of the current file used as the path argument.
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/functions/remove.html
> If path names a directory, remove(path) shall be equivalent to rmdir(path)
In short:
rm -d .snap/snapshot-name
shall be equivalent to:
remove(".snap/snapshot-name")
which in turn shall be equivalent to:
rmdir(".snap/snapshot-name")
Moreover other coreutils rm implementations (such as uutils or voreutils)
do not exhibit this bug and correctly remove non-empty directories.
Regards,
Yannick Le Pennec