bug#77597: listxattr() should return ENOTSUP for sysfs / tmpfs entries, not 0

Pádraig Brady <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.core-utils.bugs
Message-ID <c0a1f475-b973-40a8-a7cc-6947791af38a__37934.6821968042$1748000377$gmane$org@draigBrady.com>
On 23/04/2025 13:22, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Older coreutils was less efficient and always called getxattr("security.selinux"),
> and thus shows the SELinux context as expected:
> 
>     $ coreutils-9.3/src/ls -lZd /run/initramfs
>     drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root system_u:object_r:tmpfs_t:s0 60 Apr 19 14:52 /run/initramfs
>     $ coreutils-9.3/src/ls -lZd /sys/block
>     drwxr-xr-x. 2 root root system_u:object_r:sysfs_t:s0 0 Apr 23 12:54 /sys/block
> 
> However newer coreutils is more efficient, and does not call getxattr()
> if listxattr() returns 0 indicating that there are no xattrs.
> 
>     $ coreutils-9.7/src/ls -lZd /run/initramfs
>     drwxr-xr-x 3 root root ? 60 Apr 19 14:52 /run/initramfs
>     $ coreutils-9.7/src/ls -lZd /sys/block
>     drwxr-xr-x 2 root root ? 0 Apr 23 12:54 /sys/block
> 
> I also noticed the same issue with the exa utility for example.
> For coreutils to maintain efficient processing and to fix the issue centrally,
> it would be more correct for listxattr() to return ENOTSUP,
> in which case ls will try the getxattr() call and operate as expected.
> Otherwise I can't see a way for coreutils to be both efficient and always correct.
> 
> I'm currently testing on kernel 6.14.2-300.fc42.x86_64

FYI this should be addressed with:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=8b0ba61d

cheers,
Pádraig
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.