Re: [Mono-list] I give up
Joop <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings,gmane.comp.gnome.mono.general,gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi lists, (hope this does not get mis-understood... I'm not subscribed to any of the non-mono-lists :-( although I maybe should be) this problem I have seen with Mono and the other .NET implementations is just the problem the original poster poses. There is not "real commitment to"/"clear road-a-head for"/"direction in" supporting the GUI side of things. The GUI is left far behind compared to the file/networking/HTML/server etc. etc. support in these .NET implementations. This is why it is not yet fully usable to all those developers that only want to create a 'simple' GUI application. Hope this will change soon as I do have the desire to go an write some nice programs in .NET. I just don't have the need to all the file/networking/HTML/server stuff yet. wkr, Joop Zonnet Giuseppe Greco wrote: > Hi Marcus, > > Of course, Mono is still under development, but the most > important components are there, and they work. Here, at > Agamura, we are developing a sophisticated online gaming > delivery network on Linux with Mono, and up to now, we > have had just few problems... Furthermore, when we report > a bug, it is always fixed in a short time! > > Mono's implementation of ASP.NET is also usable and > mod_mono/apache seems to be faster than .NET/ISS. > > We use NAnt as build tool, and we are able to compile a > project either on Linux or MS Windows with no changes > (even if we compile on Windows just for test purposes). > > I think Mono will be one of the best .NET alternatives... > and don't forget that behind Mono there is a company > like Novell... > > So, don't feel frustrated and go ahead. > > j3d. > > >>After trying to work with Mono, Portable.NET, Qt, and KDE, I've realized >>that >>I'm fighting a battle that I cannot win. Mono supports Gtk# (and GTK+) to >>the >>exclusion of any other platform. Portable.NET is behind their own SWF >>implementation, but at least they are a bit more agnostic. The Qt/KDE >>community seems to find the entire concept of C# and its use of metadata >>and >>JIT compilation repulsive. >> >>I'm tired of trying and failing. I'm tired of having no one to support me. >>I'm >>tired of feeling isolated and alone. >> >>It's just not worth it. Maybe I will end up Windows XP and .NET. Who >>knows. I >>just know that the Free software community has got to be the most hostile >>and >>intolerant group of people I have ever encountered. >>_______________________________________________ >>Mono-list maillist - [email protected] >>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list >> > > > > ---------------------------------------- > Giuseppe Greco > > ::agamura:: > > phone: +41 (0)91 604 67 65 > mobile: +41 (0)76 390 60 32 > email: [email protected] > web: www.agamura.com > ---------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Mono-list maillist - [email protected] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list _______________________________________________ Kde-bindings mailing list [email protected] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 250 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAdOu6gBkoG+zDAg0RAoF1AKCDjq2yPtuLRXgFU1WXCplPwUeLLwCfRUlw 4oNG/5mEXMr8WYGfdlXmmsY= =GUoV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----