Re: [Mono-list] I give up

Joop <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.kde.devel.bindings,gmane.comp.gnome.mono.general,gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi lists, (hope this does not get mis-understood... I'm not subscribed 
to any of the non-mono-lists :-( although I maybe should be)
this problem I have seen with Mono and the other .NET implementations is 
just the problem the original poster poses. There is not "real 
commitment to"/"clear road-a-head for"/"direction in" supporting the GUI 
side of things. The GUI is left far behind compared to the 
file/networking/HTML/server etc. etc. support in these .NET 
implementations. This is why it is not yet fully usable to all those 
developers that only want to create a 'simple' GUI application. Hope 
this will change soon as I do have the desire to go an write some nice 
programs in .NET. I just don't have the need to all the 
file/networking/HTML/server stuff yet.
wkr,
Joop Zonnet

Giuseppe Greco wrote:
> Hi Marcus,
> 
> Of course, Mono is still under development, but the most
> important components are there, and they work. Here, at
> Agamura, we are developing a sophisticated online gaming
> delivery network on Linux with Mono, and up to now, we
> have had just few problems... Furthermore, when we report
> a bug, it is always fixed in a short time!
> 
> Mono's implementation of ASP.NET is also usable and
> mod_mono/apache seems to be faster than .NET/ISS.
> 
> We use NAnt as build tool, and we are able to compile a
> project either on Linux or MS Windows with no changes
> (even if we compile on Windows just for test purposes).
> 
> I think Mono will be one of the best .NET alternatives...
> and don't forget that behind Mono there is a company
> like Novell...
> 
> So, don't feel frustrated and go ahead.
> 
> j3d.
> 
> 
>>After trying to work with Mono, Portable.NET, Qt, and KDE, I've realized
>>that
>>I'm fighting a battle that I cannot win. Mono supports Gtk# (and GTK+) to
>>the
>>exclusion of any other platform. Portable.NET is behind their own SWF
>>implementation, but at least they are a bit more agnostic. The Qt/KDE
>>community seems to find the entire concept of C# and its use of metadata
>>and
>>JIT compilation repulsive.
>>
>>I'm tired of trying and failing. I'm tired of having no one to support me.
>>I'm
>>tired of feeling isolated and alone.
>>
>>It's just not worth it. Maybe I will end up Windows XP and .NET. Who
>>knows. I
>>just know that the Free software community has got to be the most hostile
>>and
>>intolerant group of people I have ever encountered.
>>_______________________________________________
>>Mono-list maillist  -  [email protected]
>>http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> Giuseppe Greco
> 
> ::agamura::
> 
> phone:  +41 (0)91 604 67 65
> mobile: +41 (0)76 390 60 32
> email:  [email protected]
> web:    www.agamura.com
> ----------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Mono-list maillist  -  [email protected]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/mono-list

_______________________________________________
Kde-bindings mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 250 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFAdOu6gBkoG+zDAg0RAoF1AKCDjq2yPtuLRXgFU1WXCplPwUeLLwCfRUlw
4oNG/5mEXMr8WYGfdlXmmsY=
=GUoV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.