Re: C# documentation comments in pnetlib

Would Intel's OCL docs be of any use? http://sourceforge.net/projects/ocl

Rhys Weatherley wrote:

> On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:22 am, Baron Schwartz wrote:
> 
> 
>>2) Are there any license issues?  Can we legally add similar or identical
>>documentation as exists in the MS .NET documentation?
> 
> 
> As Stephen indicated, you must not look at the MS documentation or Rotor code 
> while writing the comments, or legal issues may occur.
> 
> A lot of the core classes are already documented in the ECMA specifications, 
> and we usually refer people to them if they need class library docs.  
> Duplicating ECMA didn't seem very useful at the time.
> 
> But if you'd like to take this on (keeping the "don't look at MS" rule in 
> mind), then that would be great.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rhys.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
> 
>