Re: Safely implementing Thread.Abort
Rhys Weatherley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer |
|---|---|
| Organization | Southern Storm Software, Pty Ltd |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
For now, implement the check on backwards jump as-is. It should only need to do "if(thread->aborted) ...", which won't be too bad. And I might be able to arrange to inline that in the unroller, further reducing the overhead (it's tricky to find the "thread" in the unroller, but not impossible). Cheers, Rhys.