Re: Re: DotGNU Ported to PocketPC
Vitaliy Pronkin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer |
|---|---|
| Organization | Burning Curtain |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Why to use dotGNU instead of native runtime engine available on PocketPCs? Onboard development is interesting for many people, that's why I made this port. On Saturday 12 June 2004 23:02, Alex Stephens wrote: > I'm quite dissapointed by this. I was excited at the prospect of running .NET apps on the pocket PC with dotGNU but I can't really see much point in developing them on a pocket PC. It's interesting news but the slashdot post was misleading. > > Alex > > On 2004-06-12 21:33:59 +0400, Vitaliy Pronkin wrote: > > > Hmm.. Who writes such a stupid news? > > > > First of all, my name isn't "Pocket PC# Group" :) > > Then, I ported only C# compiler and tools, not entire DotGNU P.Net. > > Third, this don't allow to write apps FOR PocketPC - this allows to write them ON PocketPC. > > > > Regards, > > Vitaliy Pronkin, > > http://mifki.ru/pcsharp http://mifki.ru/pocketgcc > > _______________________________________________ > > Developers mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers > _______________________________________________ > Developers mailing list > [email protected] > http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers > >