Re: FW: vs project

As far as I can tell, most highly successful open source
admins have very clear ideas on the direction a project
can head.  And they aren't afraid of saying so.

http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2002/Apr/2853.html

On Sat, 2004-07-24 at 08:21, Neil Cawse wrote:
> It's a real pity you can't compromise; you might get more out of
> people...
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rhys Weatherley [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 6:07 PM
> > To: Neil Cawse
> > Subject: Re: vs project
> > 
> > On Saturday 24 July 2004 04:09 am, Neil Cawse wrote:
> > 
> > > Would that be ok - just for now?
> > 
> > No.
> > 
> > The tool for generating csproj files can be updated to generate
> MSBuild
> > files
> > in the future.  Most of the csant-reading and processing code would be
> > identical, with only a small amount of code specific to the output
> format.
> > 
> > I will not allow the CVS tree to be polluted in this way.  What's
> next?
> > Someone demands that we include NAnt files so that they can build with
> > Mono
> > without installing csant first?  Or manual Makefile's for Rotor, which
> > doesn't have any kind of build tool?  Where does it end?
> > 
> > It is tool, or nothing.  The decision has been made.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Rhys.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers