Re: Errno_map.c
Marcus <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I don't know how to determine which is the "real" errno.h. I see many files on my system with the name errno.h and several others with variations on that name. For example, ENOENT is defined in /usr/include/asm-generic/errno-base.h, but ENOSYS is defined in /usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h. This is very frustrating. On Thursday 23 September 2004 7:45 pm, Rhys Weatherley wrote: > On Friday 24 September 2004 10:30 am, Marcus wrote: > > Has someone been hacking on whatever script generates errno_map.c? I'm > > asking because the file defines errno_map.c twice, and the definition > > that gets picked up looks like this: > > This can happen if the gen_errno.sh script fails to locate the real version > of errno.h for some reason (it could be <errno.h>, <sys/errno.h>, > <asm/errno.h> or basically anything). Or the lines in the file do not > match the pattern it is looking for. You'll need to look at the first part > of "gen_errno.sh" to try to figure out why it fails. It works fine here.