Re: The usual newbie licensing question...
Reinhard Mueller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.enterprise.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | GNU Enterprise |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Fre, den 08.10.2004 schrieb Wolfgang Keller um 19:17:
> I wouldn't mind making the source freely available myself (as this will
> probably give some feedback by more experienced people than myself and thus
> teach me lots of new things), but maybe a customer won't like having to pay
> for something (actually for my time while I'm doing it) when afterwards
> their competitors can just get the same thing that they paid for for
> free...
While I fully agree with Jason on the answer to your actual question,
I'd like to add that putting your application under GPL *doesn't* mean
"their competitors can just get the same thing for free".
The GPL is about rights *you* give to *them*, not the other way around.
When you wrote software, you always have the right to sell it to whoever
you want, and you can make a contract to sell it to smoebody exclusively
if you like - regardless of the license.
However, when you sell it exclusively to your customer via GPL, it means
that *your customer* is entitled to share the program with anybody he
likes - or of course with nobody at all.
So when your customer gets the program under the GPL, it's *always* an
advantage for the customer.
I know this is a very common misunderstanding and I just wanted to
clarify this here.
Thanks,
--
Reinhard Mueller
GNU Enterprise project
http://www.gnue.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
No army can stop an idea whose time has come.
-- Victor Hugo, 1802-1885
_______________________________________________
Gnue mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnue
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD4DBQBBaSsa4LscQraoxVkRAvPOAJiGF9ZNcyNLIAUilu1p5SGkjHzQAJ9jFCiC FYFm7JkHbnDPE0SR70w2Yw== =SVxb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----