Re: NPAR TESTS
Michael Kiefte <[email protected]> Sat, 27 Mar 2004 12:12:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.fiasco.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Friday 26 March 2004 18:46, you wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 11:32:05AM -0400, Michael Kiefte wrote:
> I'm going to have a go at NPAR TESTS unless someone objects. I
> probably won't work on it this weekend though.
>
> I was going to work on this one myself. But I haven't started
> anything. So please feel free.
>
> Have you thought about how to calculate the Wilcoxon's signed rank
> statistic? It's O(n2^n) .....
Sorry, I guess you meant the distribution function. There is a normal
approximation for large sample sizes:
z = \frac{T - \frac{n(n + 1)}
{4}
}
{\sqrt{ \frac{n(n+1)(2n+1)}
{24}
}
}
I don't know what "large" means. There's some variants that do continuity
corrections and some that correct for large numbers of ties. It might take a
bit of optimising in order to determine which method is best for
fast/accurate results for a given precision. Sometimes SPSS says p < 0.05
and sometimes it says p = 0.02.
I'll look around for other algorithms too.
As for division of labour, we should make some decisions. I'm keen to do just
about anything. I still haven't figured out the SPSS syntax or the calling
structure in PSPP, so I'm sure to run into a lot of problems that I'll need
help with. Keep that in mind if you want to assign anything to me.
Or I can lay low and mark exams...
- M.