ls versus du

"Khamis Siksek" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.fileutils.bugs
Message-ID <70886DF7A3524543A417BE71F21D21DF3CC900@Estarta-EX01.corp.estartasolutions.com>
Hi all,
I don't know whether this is a bug or not, but I will describe for you what I have noticed
I am using RedHat 7.2 with kernel 2.4 (using ext3 filesystem)
There are different outputs for these utilities while I expect the same behavior
$ls -al

and 

$du . -a -b --max-depth=1

The difference is in the sizes they show, there is no match between them, for example I have a file that its size is 201 bytes using ls and 4096 using du .
 
If this is not a bug?!! can you explain this behavior for me.
 
Regards,
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.