ls versus du
"Khamis Siksek" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.fileutils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <70886DF7A3524543A417BE71F21D21DF3CC900@Estarta-EX01.corp.estartasolutions.com> |
Hi all, I don't know whether this is a bug or not, but I will describe for you what I have noticed I am using RedHat 7.2 with kernel 2.4 (using ext3 filesystem) There are different outputs for these utilities while I expect the same behavior $ls -al and $du . -a -b --max-depth=1 The difference is in the sizes they show, there is no match between them, for example I have a file that its size is 201 bytes using ls and 4096 using du . If this is not a bug?!! can you explain this behavior for me. Regards,