Re: An improvment for "ls".
David T-G <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.fileutils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nir -- ...and then Nir Peled said... % % Hello, I have an idea for the "ls" command... % A lot of users instead of using the "find" utility uses "ls -R", now.. If I ... % [Techdeck @ Techdeck ]-~-> ls -R /home/Techdeck | grep -i milf % % /home/Techdeck/milf0.1: % milf % % when it should be: % /home/Techdeck/milf0.1 % /home/Techdeck/milf0.1/milf % etc. Thanks for your suggestion, but that's what find is meant to do -- and not what ls is meant to do! The "UNIX way" is to have a tool specialize in a simple function and connect to other tools that do their jobs well, too, rather than try to have every (or even any) tool do everything all in the same package. HTH & HAND :-D -- David T-G * There is too much animal courage in (play) [email protected] * society and not sufficient moral courage. (work) [email protected] -- Mary Baker Eddy, "Science and Health" http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE96QMLGb7uCXufRwARAtMBAJ9WEZsa4N7e9KWD1WB6KEqL31oVqQCdHlpM y35PnuEcfO60vNBWnsCsRf0= =28rk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----