Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du)
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.fileutils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Here we go. again. You wanted it included, not me. I'm just telling you what you should do to make Jim happy. =) Some more nitpicks, I don't think this option deserves an short option. And maybe you could make the long option take an argument? I.e. something like --broader-size=12, this way you won't hit a "limit", and you give the user freedom to pick her own preference. Also, the option name sucks, it should be something more descriptive, maybe --size-width? One more thing, the man pages get generated from the --help output, you should document this option in the .texi manual that is located somewhere in the source tree. And finally, I hate base64 encoded patches, but that is just me. If one inlines them then one can easily comment on details or whatever, this is impossible with base64 encoded patches. Cheers.