ls -color on dumb terminals
"Kolyan" <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Feb 2003 02:04:47 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.fileutils.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <000901c2ddeb$87080ce0$381110ac@shadow> |
This problem stays more than two years (There is bugreport in 2001 in bug-fileutils). How long will you disappoint users with functionality, declared in /etc/DIR_COLORS? User can't choose, which terminals are color, which are not. Even in dumb terminal, which doesn't support color seqeuences user get [0mfile_nam[0fd [0mfile_nam[0fd [0mfile_nam[0fd [0mfile_nam[0fd with "ls --color". But this command is alias to ls in most systems. Developers must do somthing with this situation. At least, use three lines to determine, has terminal bold mode or not.