[bug #64451] Unexpected behaviour of xargs when multiple children exit with 255 in parallel

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #64451 (project findutils):

I've been able to fix this behaviour by explicitly calling
_wait_for_proc_all_(). I can't imagine any reprocussions from doing this, but
the current code expects _wait_for_proc_all_() to be called _atexit_() so I
would need some insight into whether this is good or bad.

(file #54946)

    _______________________________________________________

Additional Item Attachment:

File name: 0001-Add-quick-and-dirty-fix-for-bug-64451.patch Size:2 KB
   
<https://file.savannah.gnu.org/file/0001-Add-quick-and-dirty-fix-for-bug-64451.patch?file_id=54946>



    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?64451>

_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/