Re: gengetopt and gmake

Kevin Musker wrote:
> Probably better belongs on a gmake list... but...
> 
> This isn't possible with an implicit rule though is it?
> 
> For example:
> 
> %.h %.c: %.ggo
>      gengetopt ...
> 
> 
> 
> On 10:47, Kevin Musker wrote:
>> I'm trying to integrate gengetopt into some GNUmakefiles we have.
>>
>> The problem I've come up against is that there is no way to specify
> that
>> gengetopt is to only generate
>> either the .h or the .c.
> 
> Why would you want to do that? You may specify multiple targets, like in
> the following:
> 
> foo.cmdline.h foo.cmdline.c: foo.ggo
>            gengetopt ...
> 
> Have fun
> Andre

Hi Andre

do you need this feature for optimization reasons?

otherwise could you write in gmake rules such as:

%.h: %.ggo
%.c: %.ggo
      gengetopt ...

just for curiosity.

However, it would be quite straightforward for me to add what you 
request :-)
I'm asking only to understand the reason why you need this feature.

hope to hear from you soon
	Lorenzo

-- 
+-----------------------------------------------------+
|  Lorenzo Bettini          ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     |
|  PhD in Computer Science                            |
|  Dip. Sistemi e Informatica, Univ. di Firenze       |
|  Tel +39 055 4237460, Fax +39 055 4237437           |
|  Florence - Italy        (GNU/Linux User # 158233)  |
|  Home Page        : http://www.lorenzobettini.it    |
|  http://music.dsi.unifi.it         XKlaim language  |
|  http://www.purplesucker.com Deep Purple Cover Band |
|  http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite           |
|  http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt              |
|  http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/gengen       |
|  http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/doublecpp    |
+-----------------------------------------------------+