Re: mutually exclusive group of options
Andre Noll <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.gengetopt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 14:46, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > A situation like the one you describes implicitly requires mutually > exclusive groups (not groups of mutually exclusive options), i.e., the > program accepts two different (or more than two) mutually exclusive > syntaxes (besides a possibly common options). And probably the best > thing would be to add such features. Yes, that would be _very_ useful. There are many programs that have "general" options such as --verbose as well as "subcommand" options (like Papp Gyozo's --init, --attach), each of which requires its own set of options. Regards Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGcsLnWto1QDEAkw8RAgIUAKCCe27QNQ+H/C4sKAjRxpzEprNbYACfcPST hUkoa0wcjOqdvvQVCYdTwzM= =MWEf -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----