Re: Gengetopt 2.21 enhancement suggestions

Andre Noll <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:54:00 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.gengetopt.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 17:35, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:

> >>of course range makes sense only for integers right?
> >
> >It would also make sense for floats. And it would be nice to also have
> >"infinite" intervals, i.e. something like "int range=0.." meaning
> >the given integer value must not be negative.
> >
> 
> anyway, only for numerical values, right?

<mathematician hat on> For all type of options such that the
underlying set carries a canonical partial order <mathematician
hat off>.

This includes strings as well:

	string range="bar..baz"

means that the given string must be between "bar" and "baz" in
the lexicographical order.

Note that the "right" lexicographical order depends on the current
locale which is probably a bit strange. As a locale-independent
variant, one could use

	strcmp("bar", arg) <= 0 && strcmp(arg, "baz") <= 0

to test whether arg is valid.

However, I'm not sure at all if the range thing is really useful for
non-numerical values.

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHE40YWto1QDEAkw8RArO9AJ9J6VdgpLkSmjCp4GT+Eto3/JFqGgCfecDe
m9USg/PEsTsiB9Bk9FA1WTY=
=7tRD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----