Re: Gengetopt 2.21 enhancement suggestions
Andre Noll <[email protected]> Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:54:00 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.gengetopt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17:35, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> >>of course range makes sense only for integers right?
> >
> >It would also make sense for floats. And it would be nice to also have
> >"infinite" intervals, i.e. something like "int range=0.." meaning
> >the given integer value must not be negative.
> >
>
> anyway, only for numerical values, right?
<mathematician hat on> For all type of options such that the
underlying set carries a canonical partial order <mathematician
hat off>.
This includes strings as well:
string range="bar..baz"
means that the given string must be between "bar" and "baz" in
the lexicographical order.
Note that the "right" lexicographical order depends on the current
locale which is probably a bit strange. As a locale-independent
variant, one could use
strcmp("bar", arg) <= 0 && strcmp(arg, "baz") <= 0
to test whether arg is valid.
However, I'm not sure at all if the range thing is really useful for
non-numerical values.
Andre
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHE40YWto1QDEAkw8RArO9AJ9J6VdgpLkSmjCp4GT+Eto3/JFqGgCfecDe m9USg/PEsTsiB9Bk9FA1WTY= =7tRD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----