Re: Re: Gengetopt 2.21 enhancement suggestions

Papp Gyozo (VBuster) wrote:
>>> I have explicitly said that I want enums.
> 
> So do I. ;)
> 
>> However, 90 would not be a valid enum (since it starts with a
>> number)
> 
> What about rotate_90 after the option name in this example? In
> general the <option>_<value> form would be a deliberate decision
> because at this time I could change at least 5 string options to
> enums in one of my apps. The bunch of simple "enum_"s may confuse
> developers.

yes, that's a nice solution! :-)

hope to work on that soon!
cheers
	Lorenzo

-- 
Lorenzo Bettini, PhD in Computer Science, DSI, Univ. di Firenze
ICQ# lbetto, 16080134     (GNU/Linux User # 158233)
HOME: http://www.lorenzobettini.it MUSIC: http://www.purplesucker.com
http://www.myspace.com/supertrouperabba
BLOGS: http://tronprog.blogspot.com  http://longlivemusic.blogspot.com
http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt
http://www.gnu.org/software/gengen http://doublecpp.sourceforge.net