Re: Re: GNU Gengetopt 2.22
Andre Noll <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:34:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.gengetopt.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09:18, Lorenzo Bettini wrote: > >and for the type punning question, I preferred not to pass a void ** > >pointer (I zero the pointer outside the function). > > > >Could you please check this version? I tried to recreate your compiler > >command line arguments so that I got the warnings too; now, with make > >check, I don't get warnings anymore... > > > > anyone tried this? Yes, I just tried it, and I can confirm that the code generated by this gengetopt version doesn't cause gcc to spit out the type punning warnings. Thanks a lot, Lorenzo Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe _______________________________________________ Help-gengetopt mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHoLUhWto1QDEAkw8RAiDbAKCPNURJyChgjht317Qu6iSjrbwNUACbBmqw 9sENqyD5lTUTanmWY1Ls0bw= =MpXb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----