Re: override and multiple options

On 14:17, Lorenzo Bettini wrote:
> By the way, an easy work around (and also a feature enhancement) could 
> be add another field to the argument structure (let me compliment with 
> myself by using a structure instead of many parameters to the parser 
> function, which makes it extensible without breaking existing code ;-):
> 
> override_multiple with the semantics you propose!

Yes, that's exacly what I had in mind too :)

And yes again, it was wise and anticipatory to design the public
functions so that they take (pointers to) structures rather than
single values.

Andre
-- 
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe

_______________________________________________
Help-gengetopt mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gengetopt

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJR6mTWto1QDEAkw8RAtEwAJ9yHcD491eh51ydUU9SctvVSAUXxgCghXqz
l0ctA4WrLkh790XGjdx1hxY=
=ym1d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----