Re: Re: Patches AMD 64 next try...
Wolfgang Müller <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.gift.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | Universität Bamberg |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday 26 February 2007 16:07, [email protected] wrote: > You and I are getting different results. You're using whats in CVS, and > the one line change i mentioned in the last mail, right? > > i used to run into something that sounds like your bug, but i dont remember > the details, its been months since i messed with it. > I applied the patches you sent to this list relevant to FeatureExtraction (the other ones, too), and I found that most of them were already applied in CVS. So I had the impression of being pretty up-to-date :-) . I will post my current gabor.c to this list to make sure that we speak about the same thing. It's at home behind a NAT so tomorrow earliest. > personally, i break things, then valgrind them to death. i'll let you know > when i have progress with this. The fact that you said that the output of your stuff was bit-compatible to David's suggests that David's version had the same bug (yielding some calculation glitches), but that the optimisations make it become apparent as segfault on 64 bit. Cheers, Wolfgang -- Dr. Wolfgang Müller LS Medieninformatik Universität Bamberg Check out the SIG MM web site http://www.sigmm.org