| Newsgroups |
gmane.comp.gnu.gift.general |
| Message-ID |
<[email protected]> |
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 04:41:13PM +0100, David Squire wrote:
> Wolfgang Müller wrote:
> >>just wondering if anyone has had a chance to try out my optimized feature
> >>extractor yet.
> >>
> >
> >Sorry, still trying to catch up on sleep after a tough weekend.
> >
> >I was just wanting to ask David: Did you look at it? Do you want to do it?
> >
> Not yet. I would like to, but I can't make it first priority at present.
> If it's byte-compatible and faster, then I say go with it. It would be
> good to get it tested on a variety of systems though (esp. 64 bit).
>
agreed. testing is certainy in order.
> In any case, I would prefer to see a set-up where it is easy to select
> from a variety of feature extractors, rather than have this clobber the
> legacy Viper code (esp. since IIRC there are cases when this is *not*
> faster).
sorry about that. thats my own fault. in testing with your origional
PPM library, i discovered this program runs at "full speed" when i
forget all my SSE2 flags. i've basically been optimizing the code to run
on a "small cache, large CPU, deep pipeline" system. such as my P4. ;)
so, again, i THINK this runs at the faster speed on lower end hardware.
but i havent the hardware to test. ;)
>
> Sorry about this, but I am deep in Perl and MySQL with Damocles at present.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
>
> --
> Dr David McG. Squire, Senior Lecturer, on sabbatical in 2006
> Caulfield School of Information Technology, Monash University, Australia
> CRICOS Provider No. 00008C http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~davids/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> help-GIFT mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gift