Re: Indexing c/c++ comments and text files
Michael Sullivan <[email protected]> Mon, 19 Jul 2010 21:55:29 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.global.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I only cited id-utils in my first message so that you could see an example where another tags system had a capability that appears to be missing natively in global. However, I'm not actually trying to generate an id-utils database -- I consider the gtags/global database, tools, and output to be superior. Instead, I have two different problems that can be potentially solved in different ways: Comments -------- Comments in files parsed by the c/c++ parser (as identified in the langmap) are ignored. I'm wondering if it would be possible to add a command line option to not skip the symbols in comments. Text Files ---------- Text files that potentially contain useful things to search for (e.g. MIB files) don't appear to have a parser (as identified in the langmap). I'm wondering if it would be possible to add a text parser that could be used to simply index every word in those files. On 19-Jul-2010, at 9:24 PM, Shigio YAMAGUCHI wrote: > You can use the functions of id-utils by the -I option of gtags and global. > Is it insufficient? > >> I would like to instruct global/gtags to index c/c++ comments (and potentially other text files). For example, the following c++ comment text isn't currently indexed by global/gtags, but I would like it to be: >> >> // SOME_IMPORTANT_ENUM_1 >> "Some corresponding text 1", >> >> // SOME_IMPORTANT_ENUM_2 >> "Some corresponding text 2", >> >> etc. >> >> The comment text refers to symbols that are indexed elsewhere and I want a cross-reference search to return references to the comment lines above. >> >> When I used to use id-utils, I was able to achieve this by telling it that c/c++ files were actually text (e.g. set those extensions up to use the text parser in id-utils' langmap). Although I found a langmap setting in the .globalrc file, it doesn't appear to have a "text" parser. >> >> Is there a possibility of adding something like this?