Re: So for C++ support should one use "universal-ctags"? What are the current limitations?

Hello,
Unfortunately, there is currently no maintainer for this.
I'm rather thinking of using Universal ctags in the future.

The reason for thinking so is
o Universal ctags can be used as a plug-in parser of gtags(1).
o Universal ctags is well maintained.
o Little known, but Universal ctags can treat references.
  However, there is no parser which uses that function yet.

Either way, what's missing is the parser writer.

Regards,
Shigio

2021=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=8825=E6=97=A5(=E6=9C=A8) 1:29 Gautam Thaker <ghthaker@=
gmail.com>:
>
>
> In release notes for 6.6.5 I read:
>
> [DEPRECATED]
> o gtags: the built-in C++ parser is deprecated, since it is not well main=
tained.
>   Currently, it is hard to say that GLOBAL supports C++ language.
>
> What is state of C++ support? I really like being able to have my global/=
gtags/ggtags.el eco-system provide me C++ definitions AND references (where=
 methods/functions are being called from.) universal-ctags, I don't believe=
 it can find  references.
>
> What is the state of C++ support and what is the likely future?
>
> Thanks.
>
>


--=20
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <[email protected]>
PGP fingerprint:
26F6 31B4 3D62 4A92 7E6F  1C33 969C 3BE3 89DD A6EB