Re: [Child Process unable to receive input from a file(script)]

On 06/26/2014 07:28 PM, al davis wrote:
> Perhaps CMD::command() should be eliminated.  That whole file
> should be reviewed.
>
> So, I ask myself .. why was it created?  Answer: to simplify the
> interface for commands that call a collection of other commands.
> It doesn't work to pass the stream in the usual way because
> doing so would clobber it.  Also, avoiding accounting and the
> like makes the command look like a single command, and not the
> sum of its parts.  That is needed, so CMD::command stays.

One could give it a new name such as:

CMD::commandchunks
CMD::commandfromchunks
CMD::commandparts
CMD::commandfromparts
CMD::commandassemblage
CMD::commandlist