Re: testing

On Friday 30 January 2015, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> about coverage... you might find gcov/lcov useful. it does
> not require code manipulation or manual bookkeeping and the
> results are much more detailed. roughly, (from my notes, not
> recently tested) the following once created a bunch of
> interesting .html files for me.

The statistics generated is much more detailed, but that's not 
the goal.  The goal is to guide the human to make better code, 
and to keep track of how it is going.

Lots of tools lose sight of the real needs.  Then we become 
slaves to the tools.