Re: testing
Felix Salfelder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.gnucap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:39:48AM -0500, al davis wrote: > The name is not important at all, but the idea is to keep Make1 > away from autotools, How can i keep Make1 away from autotools, if it is the input to automake? (i am assuming here, that Make1 somehow corresponds to Makefile.am). and why would one/you/i even want to do that? > Just use it > as is. A while back I considered changing the name of Make1 to > Makefile.am, but then ran into other issues. sounds interesting. the autotools branch more or less does this. so what are/were the issues? i cannot address issues that i don't know about. remember that i still do not know a use case for the build system you are outlining (except to build, which i believe autotools is pretty good at). thanks felix