Re: "transient" branch
al davis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.gnucap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 23:34:08 +0200 Felix Salfelder <[email protected]> wrote: > is this "2." intentional? the latter looks more "logical" to me... No. Artifact of an extra call to next(), which tells it to stop, then is carried over. ++hidden is in the wrong place. This example really should say 0 for all, since there are no hidden steps. The count displayed includes the displayed step. If there are no objections, I will change it so it is the true count of hidden steps, not hidden+1.