Re: "crash" branch

Felix Salfelder <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.gnucap.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 09:09:07PM -0400, al davis wrote:
> The failed assert probably could be commented out.  Not removed, but
> commented out.  A commented out assert means "this really should be
> true, but sometimes it isn't".

Thanks for giving the background. Yes, it's not a real problem.

I was thinking about adding an error(..., "logic race in %s", label);,
so one can actually see the commented out assertion..

i am trying to make the logic more verilog friendly (accessible, to
begin with). This is required for gnucsator, because a global logic
modelcard does not play with gate parameters, and local modelcards do
not connect properly ("different logic models used..."). the "logic"
branch fixes this.

somewhat lower priority: i'd be happy to implement the logic+subckt
models without the lang_spice hacks. do you have any particular
(non-spice) representation in mind? does it exist?

cheers
felix
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.