Re: System simulation

al davis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.gnucap.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sunday 18 March 2007 06:07, Thomas Lundin wrote:
> I played around with gnucap a few years ago and thought that
> the interactivity would make it "easy" to get it to talk to
> an micro-controller simulator. And now when micro-controller
> simulator people has joined up with the circuit simulator
> people on this list I thought I'd get some opinions.
>
> What got me into this is that it's possible to continue a
> transient analasys where it left off after it has been
> stopped. If I recall correctly it is possible to change
> component values around while it's halted and continue with
> those new values.

That still works :-)

> My thought was to create a new logic device that works as an
> "digital generator" that can be changed between 1 and 0 from
> the command line. The plan was then that the MCU-simulator
> would interact with gnucap through a pipe.

The existing logic device is scheduled for some big changes.  
Probably the best way to accomplish what you want is a "bm" 
function.  Any component can have an expression, with a 
function, like PWL, TANH, and the Spice time dependent sources.  
These are defined in the "bm" files.  (Behavioral modeling, 
1980's style).  

What I recommend is to make a new bm file, maybe you could call 
it "bm_external.cc" that lets you set a value from a pipe.  
Another approach might be to define a new device with 
a ".model" file.

> Would this be enough from a gnucap point of view to get
> gnucap and a MCU-simulator (gpsim for instance) be able to
> act as system simulator where you can simulate your software
> together with your electronics?
>
> A second and required step would be to add ADC's and DAC's.

The plan is full Verilog-AMS, eventually.  Before that, you 
could make those as ".model" files.  The ".model" files are 
compiled into ".cc" files by "gnucap-modelgen".  Compiling 
that ".cc" makes a ".so" that can be used as a plugin.  This 
functionality exists now, in the development snapshot.

Future plans include being able to "attach foo.cc" 
or "attach "bar.model" with a single command, and have the 
compiling done automatically.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.