Re[2]: Fwd: common_component and eval_bm_acton_base

Hello Al,



>> 3) pass original EVAL_BM_MODEL to new_common() in "this" to
>> call  new constructors, which will create properly
>> initialized objects

ad> This is incorrect because EVAL_BM_MODEL contains no information, 
ad> only placeholders.  The correct values are in the daughter 
ad> object, which would be wiped out when the placeholder is copied 
ad> over it.

May be we speak about different things.
I speak about _temp_c value (as an example).

It is initialized for EVAL_BM_MODEL during precalc_first() and then it
is lost when EVAL_BM_MODEL is converted into EVAL_BM_SEMI_RESISTOR during
expand().

please test that.

Regards
Gena







-- 
Best regards,
 Gserdyuk                            mailto:[email protected]