Re: ELEMENT interface question
Felix Salfelder <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.gnu.gnucap.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 02:11:26PM +0100, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> imho, giving up those (potential) models would be too bad, so ELEMENT
> needs to be enhanced somehow. i'd like to give it a try, if you haven't
> already worked out something. ideas, objections, warnings are welcome.
when implementing the filters i must have missed that
COMMON_COMPONENT::tr_{accept,review}(COMPONENT*) are not const.
as it seems, the COMMON_COMPONENT is intended to be abused for device
states (in that case it's no longer 'common').
so at least the oscillator should be fine after changing operator==
to return false.
sorry for the noise
felix