git or Fossil?

John Griessen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.gnu.gnucap.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
On 04/24/2013 10:28 PM, al davis wrote:
> It looks like "git" is the choice,
> but I invite other opinions.


Fossil has some nice features.  It's not like git in its assumptions about needing to
triage many code offerings from many many developers.  It doesn't use the rebase idea of git.
It keeps all history in every clone.  has web UI for  displaying the history and branches.

John Griessen
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.